Publickeytoken null does not have an implementation

Tuesday, May 13, AM. The interface is only defined once. I've scoured through all the code and can't find any sort of mismatch - only one assembly has changed and that is the one that is generating the error. One possible issue i'd like some clarification on if possible: An anomolie I noticed when reviewing the existing working assemblies with Reflector was as follows: An assembly InformationManagementSystem.

Facade in reflector has only 2 referenced assemblies. When I re-compile this file it is forcing me to reference a third. It contains the follownig code: Code Snippet. InlandCarriageRegister ;. Hi, I'm receiving the same error in a pc "1", i have not found a solution for this, but i copied the same project [dlls,code] to another pc "2", and it compiles and debugs perfectly!! Thursday, December 18, AM. Ok, I was getting this error and found a way through it.

I have a similar setup with regards to my the interfaces as the OP, except that I have another interface in between in a separate assembly.

I have a base library that derives from the second assembly. My executable assembly has all three assemblies as references. I then started getting this strange error message at runtime.

It wasn't until I opened up that intermediate assembly and re-compiled it, that this error vanished. Friday, March 20, PM. Friday, November 5, PM. I had the same error. We're looking into updating our samples early Jan to account for the newer Appium changes and default app changes, so please stay tuned.

I have tried some of the other C samples. I have also tried the difference between QualityTools. UnitTestFramework and TestPlatform. That brought me nothing. I am completely lost. How I am I supposed to get anything working if even the samples don't?

Also the described relation of WinAppDriver to Appium is confusing. Whether it should be installed, or running, the versions of either of them. I concluded I only need WinAppDriver. This helped me for the Dispose problem. I updated all NuGet packages in the CalculatorTest sample, however, an exception is thrown when I run the unit test. In addition, I found the DesiredCapabilities is deprecated, but I don't know how to replace it.

What's the status of the updates? Hey guys It is now mid-March. Any updates on resolving compatibility? Hi DingpingZhang , essenius , okobets ,. We recently updated the samples - could you try using them with the default Nuget configuration? Hi Hassanuz, I am getting the same error on Calculator sample tests Any idea how I can resolve this?

I'm solved the problem for me by using Appium. Setup method from:. I managed to do the same on the code and got it working.. Webdriver 3. Support to 3. Thanks kope13 this helped out big time. One thing to note, it seemed that the WindowsDriver requires a type to be defined, so I modified the last line to:. We actually updated our samples when WinAppDriver v1. For anyone running into issues with the latest samples on Master, please let us know which version of Windows you are using, and what exact error you are running into.

I was getting the same error described in the OP. Rather than rolling back to Selenium 3. The problem appears to be an incompatibility issue with newer Selenium drivers. Webdriver 4. NET Framework 4. Thanks for the info CreaturePrime.

It looks like it wasn't a change of the functions runtime version. I also didn't update RazorLight, been running RC3 for a while. I can't reproduce it locally. Are you by any chance running it in Azure Functions? Sorry, something went wrong.

This is my csproj header:. I just have function. I think the right way to solve this problem is to get the function. Unfortunately, package search engines like nuget. The key difference in mine looks like Azure. Core bumped from 1. Having exactly the same problem as darnmason. I'm not sure but it probably has something to do with the order in which assembly binding occurs. What logging do I need to turn on jzabroski could you please specify the steps you think will help?

I had contributed documentation to this probing page because I was getting a lot of tickets about assembly binding issues, mostly from Azure Functions customers. Does it make any meaning to you jzabroski. So, in the old days of. NET, binding Redirects would work across compile time and run-time, so you would say 0. But with roll forward, it is all statically linked by the compiler once, and then rolled forward to the latest SDK target at the time dotnet run occurs, UNLESS you do a framework dependent deployment.

HOWEVER, as you can infer, since a lot of people are running this in Azure, I dont think there is a way to run framework dependent deployment in Azure but I use AWS and am definitely not an expert in selling Azure solutions to my clients, however rich it would make me.

At this time at least for me it is working well in azure servers. This affects me only when using the local func.

Questions for you jzabroski :. Some people were not happy with how I packaged 2. NET Core 3. NET Core binaries from nuget and shipping them as an SDK that resides locally on disk, and the workaround would be to use their experimental tree shaking and do self-contained deployments.

But that creates its own black hole of problems, since I don't personally feel the whole MSBuild SDK concept was particularly well designed. If you search GitHub, I argued that SDKs should be injectable dependencies, and the way target frameworks were designed was simply wrong. The focus is more on optimization and efficient binaries, as that is directly mappable to economic benefits like higher operating margins for Azure.

Just my own 2 cents. The DirtyAssemblyResolveHelper is certainly a thing I will look at, but it is a more complex long-term workaround. For now what I tried so far is: I removed all old netcore sdk versions, I now have only version 3.

I compared both versions 3. Something is not adding up. Is it using the version from func. I am not super familiar with func. Is it a self-contained deployment, or is it rolling forward to the latest patch version?

See attached both deps and runtimeConfig func. I don't think there is a great solution here. I had spoken to Immo Landwerth about these types of modularity problems, and I think it never got addressed although I do think he wanted to at least respond to my comments if not address the issue.

In java, they have a "bind" tool that does co-constraints the guarantee a single binary version is loaded. It's not great but it's basically what is needed to solve run-time dependencies.

I think the problem is not exactly to load 3. I think the problem lives on indirect dependencies when a project starts to get large. For eg I can see this:. In my prod case RazorLight is referenced on a NETStd20 project, which seem to have a lower requirement than the netcore3. When you create a direct dependency, you opt in to roll forward.

When you have an indirect dependency, it does not. Check all of them if they are correct especially look at Glass. Some of your projects still reference old Glass.

Core nuget package instead of new Glass. Use "Manage nuget packages for your solution option and find Glass. Improve this answer. Marek Musielak Marek Musielak I found 2 configus which mention Glass, but they don't seem to be to be in conflict: Glass. I'm not sure how to check versions of the dlls, can you provide guidance? I have the most recent of Glass on the project but should I have both "Glass.

Sc" and "Glass. I have both installed always has been. In older Sitecore version there was Glass. Core nuget package. Now it should be Glass. Core with. Make sure you don't include the nuget package without the number — Marek Musielak.