Anu course outline template

ES Financials. TM1 Budgeting. Concur Expense Management. Finance policies. Current projects Service improvement Legal services. University Services Feedback. Prepare presentations and documents based on official University-branded templates. Related links Fonts. Contact Design studio. Send email. Marketing request form.

You appear to be using Internet Explorer 7, or have compatibility view turned on. Class summaries form part of the evidence used by Colleges to make determinations about the reaccreditation of courses.

The class summary template in the Curriculum Management System supports regular and triggered course reviews undertaken by Colleges. If appropriate, some moderation of marks might be applied prior to final results being released. Related Content Policy Student assessment coursework Class summary Procedures Student assessment coursework Guidelines Code of practice for teaching and learning.

Printable version PDF. Deputy Vice-Chancellor Academic. Academic Board. Pass Work of satisfactory quality, which displays an adequate understanding of most of the subject matter and a sufficient grasp of relevant skills. Meets or exceeds client expectations. Credit Work of good quality, which displays a good understanding of the subject matter and a sound grasp of relevant skills. Delivers value that meets the expectations of the client or target market. Distinction Work of superior quality, which demonstrates a thorough knowledge and understanding of the subject matter, proficiency in relevant skills, and analytical, design and implementation ability of a high order.

Delivers value that exceeds the expectations of the client or target market. High Distinction Work of exceptional quality, which demonstrates comprehensive understanding of the subject matter, mastery of relevant skills, sophisticated or original analysis, design and implementation, and outstanding quality in clarity, precision and presentation of work.

Life cycle processes? Project management And the graduate competencies that you are demonstrating in the project: Engineers Australia Graduate Competencies When researching journals for your project, many standards and standards can be accessed on campus, or off-campus using the ANU?

A lightweight model-based systems engineering approach Approval processes for project activities Insurance Insurance is required if you travel off-site to meet with clients. Once you have an agreement ready to sign, you should seek your own independent legal advice before signing.

If you do NOT obtain independent legal advice, this is your choice; however, the delegate at ANU will not sign the Preferred Agreement without written acknowledgement that you have been advised to seek independent legal advice. If you have signed the agreement, it will need to be submitted to college staff for signing by the college delegate.

You must also submit an email stating that you have understood the need to obtain your own independent legal advice. Include examiners, tutors and observers The Many Eyes Process used in Capstone Project requires examiners, tutors and students from other teams shadows to evaluate the work produced by a team.

Expenses How to deal with expenses you may incur We do not expect students to bare any significant costs associated with the course.

The grant can be used for activities relating to: hardware for prototyping or producing an artefact, consumables directly relating to producing a product. Approval There is no guarantee for partial or full reimbursement of a Microgrant if pre-approval is not completed.

To obtain approval for a Microgrant, send an email to the course convener outlining: A short summary of the project need for expenditure in the email An itemised list of proposed or incurred expenses as an attachment for our records A link to full financial records for your project a link to your repository A link to any research into purchase options justifying the decision a link to your repository In addition, please CC your tutor into the email for endorsement.

Disbursements After approval of a Microgrant, funds can be accessed the following ways: Reimbursement For situations where the team has purchased items using their own funds To be reimbursed, one team member will need to complete the Expense Reimbursement Form , together with copies of all authentic receipts of purchase in one PDF.

Once confirmed, your reimbursement will be forwarded to the relevant School Admin to process the reimbursement. Purchase For situations where the team is unable to cover the costs of the purchase, the school can organise purchase To initiate the purchase, please contact the relevant convener to obtain instructions. One team member will need to provide a purchase order or online order that can be fulfilled by School administration.

Considerations If, for any reason, you are in a situation where your project and learning will be at risk because of funding limitations, please talk to the convener. Philosophical notes and comments This section discusses many of the philosophical underpinning of this course.

These resources have been compiled over a number of years working with student groups. Listen to the program on the Radio National website. Read the book: Red Teaming: How to bulletproof your business by questioning the unquestionable by Bryce G.

Hoffman Playing the devil? In doing so, you will be able to present a great story in your project audit, leading to great outcomes staying humble as a learner - you are presenting your work to domain experts.

It is entirely professional to demonstrate you understand the limits of your work. Presenting your work Your professional responsibilities are on show here. Professionalism at Meetings The aim of the Tutor Meetings is for you and your team to develop and practise the ability to succinctly present work, and to then address comments and questions in a coherent manner. With this context in mind, it is important for everyone in the room to: introduce clients and other stakeholders who are present engage in the process - no mobile phones, laptops, et cetera be respectful of others - particularly the team presenting and their client while robust, frank and open discussion is very much encouraged, it is not acceptable for people to abuse and attack each other.

The point of robust interactions is to help improve approaches and outcomes Presentation tips Be honest and open - put your cards on the table. There are people around who know the truth. Be enthusiastic about your work and proud of what you have achieved. Act like a team. No back-biting or contradictions. When pitching - everyone to be engaged in the presentation - we can learn a lot by looking at those who are not presenting! Talk about what you have learned from both failure and success - technical and project perspectives.

Always have something concrete to show or demo. Remember that some people will have no idea what you are doing. Set the scene for the context for the system you are developing, what the client?

Repository tips Reviewers will use your Audit Landing Page to guide their review. Make it easy for them to find the work you want reviewed. Make sure you refer to evidence and rationale for decisions made by your team. For example, meeting minutes, slack communications et cetera. Make sure all reviewers have access rights to read your repositories. If you have physical artefacts you want reviewed, then make clear to the reviewer how they can inspect them - eg.

It is really up to you to decide how you present your work for review. Evaluation tips Make sure you are clear what the role of a shadow is See the Audit Guidelines for tips on conducting your evaluations Conducting Project Audits Projects are reviewed by tutors, team shadows and the team itself using our Many Eyes Process. This page provides some guidelines you might consider when conducting your audit.

A good process is to: Familiarise yourself with the Audit marking criteria, and the Project Review form. Review the work completed by the team and form an overall view as to its quality. More specific tips: Look at the actual work done It is important that you look for evidence of the actual work completed by the team. If you cannot find the actual work done, then contact the team so that they can improve their work. Look through the repositories Every team is expected to have put in place mechanisms to store and track the artefacts they produce during their project.

The repositories should be well organised and incorporate version control - especially for software projects. If there is no repository, then provide feedback such as No evidence , Work is inaccessible. Check that version control is being used. A complete version history is a good way to understand the processes and progress of work undertaken by the team.

If, for example, a team has just uploaded a bunch of work in recent days, then provide feedback such as Ad-hoc processes. Look for evidence If the team claims to have completed specific work, then you must check that they have actually done that work and that it is of real value. The Audit landing Page should refer you to this evidence could be documentation, meeting minutes, prototypes, code etc. For example, the inclusion of a project plan needs to be backed up with evidence that they are actually using the plan.

If they are not using the plan, then it is of very little value. Look for decision-making Teams are expected to make, implement and track decisions during their project. You should look for evidence of this during your review documentation, meeting records etc. It is very important that decisions are supported with evidence. For example, there should be evidence demonstrating the feasibility of any requirements specification or detailed project plan produced by a team.

This may take the form of stakeholder consultation, experimentation, prototyping, evaluations, research, et cetera. In summary, the Many Eyes Process comprises three stages: Collection of feedback through Project Reviews from students self evaluation , peers, tutors, clients and examiners.

Reflection and Action on the feedback performed by the team. Careful consideration of data from all sources to award the progress indicator. Inputs and Outputs The Audit processes takes the Project Work as input and, through a team-led quality control process, provides valuable formative feedback on the groups project.

Consideration from all sources The Professional Portfolio uses a similar process, with the self, tutor and convener roles. Late submissions and extensions Reasonable requests for extensions, special consideration and accessibility will be considered with courteous regard to the due dates.

No late submissions will be accepted for the Audit processes; these must be submitted on time. Submissions, feedback and improvement Links to digital repositories and other submissions will be submitted through Wattle, even through the bulk of your work will be accessible through repositories linked through Wattle. Marking and assessment The work you do in this course should transcend the normal assessment processes; the value of the outcomes from your project should provide you with examples of experience, mentoring and an application of systems approaches to engineering problem solving that will help launch your career.

Resubmission of assessable works Groups may be required to resubmit work where the submission is deemed below acceptable quality, or requires major revision. Referencing requirements There are no specific referencing requirements. Grievances, issues, and complaints If you have a problem with the marks you receive, there is a process that you can follow to come to a resolution on the issue.

If you would like to appeal your grade, this process must be initiated within two weeks of receiving your mark: discuss the issue with your tutor. Your tutor will provide further comments, clarification and sage advice if needed. If the issue remains unresolved, you can: ask the course convener to re-mark the assessment - this requires you to first submit in writing exactly what your concerns are and how the marking has missed some significant aspect of your work against the criteria.

Not including this information will lead to the convener denying this request. Final Grades Final grades are subject to deliberations at School and College examiners meetings. Turnitin submissions The following applies specifically to your Professional reflection, but all work in your repository is subject to academic integrity. Policies for studying at ANU ANU has educational policies, procedures and guidelines, which are designed to ensure that staff and students are aware of the University?

Other key policies include: Student Assessment Coursework Student Surveys and Evaluations Course improvement There will be opportunities to provide feedback throughout the course to the course convener, tutors, and course reps.

Online systems for ENGN students are now streamlined. The central system for Capstone is Wattle.